Sorry, I was fantasizing so much about quilting that I forgot that it was Booking Through Thursday yesterday.
- What is the most battered book in your collection? The one with loose pages, tattered corners, and page edges so soft that there's not even a risk of paper cuts anymore? Oh, I love those soft edges! loose pages and torn dust jackets bother me (and so I mend them carefully), but I feel lucky to come across one with edges like velvet.
- Why is this book so tattered? Is it that you love it so much that you've read it a zillion times? Is it a reference book you've used every day for the last seven years? Something your new puppy teethed on when you weren't looking? I suppose that it's unfair to blame these books' decrepitude entirely on myself, as they are paperbacks of a certain age, with all of the brittle and yellowing paper that that implies. But these three -- chosen at random from the first shelf I visited -- are some that I remember reading over and over again, and I'm surprised now that they are still relatively whole. Princess Tales was a Scholastic purchase -- flyers were handed out regularly in school, and you could order a book or two and it would be delivered in class a week or so later. I got this one in late elementary school, so I was around ten or eleven, I guess -- it cost sixty cents! -- it's one of the few I still have (the others are Baby Island by Carol Ryrie Brink, and a Romeo and Juliet with the lovely Olivia Hussey on the cover). I wasn't princess-mad in the way that my own girls are today -- some girls I knew did have lots of frilly things like that, but it was generally a lot less widespread than it is now. I loved the adventure, probably more than the romance, and the international flavor of this collection as well, with stories from England, France, Ireland, Morocco, and such, much like Andrew Lang's collections, which I also devoured at the public library. (E. Nesbit's Melisande is still available in some places with lovely illustrations by P.J. Lynch.) As a mother now, and a feminist, I appreciate the variety of characters I see in this collection, not the rather silly and ineffective ones like Cinderella and Sleeping Beauty, who simply wait around for the prince to save them or recognize their beauty, but ones like Jay Williams' "The Practical Princess," who does the rescuing herself, or bad-tempered ones like "The Princess and the Vagabone." Much more interesting! The Diary of Anne Frank needs no introduction from me, of course; this is probably the book that I reread most often as a teenager, and what started me keeping a diary at the tender age of twelve. Every rereading brought something home to me -- the fact that teenagers could write so well, that I wasn't the only one with those kinds of feelings, the horrors of war and their price in human suffering. (I have a lot to thank Anne for.) I actually remember buying The Song of Bernadette, from one of those revolving wire racks, I think at the grocery store, of all places -- I was in high school, I guess, and already fascinated in a strange and inexplicable way by nuns and the monastic life (since I am not Catholic and am far too self-indulgent for such a life). I read this book many times, and mended the bumped and rubbed cover carefully with Scotch tape. Werfel wrote brilliantly, and I was impressed even then that a German Jewish man could so interestingly and effortlessly convey the story of a French Catholic girl. (Another lesson most likely unlooked-for by the author, that people whom one wouldn't expect to understand things very often do.)
I realize that this is your space, but you can't expect me to leave this uncommented-upon! I confess with some timidity (but not to YOU) that one of the most worn, velvety books in my library is "These Happy Golden Years" -- yes, it was the most romantic and grownup of all Laura's childhood stories, but there was much more to its siren-song, which called to me repeatedly from the age of about 10 until oh...now? Her childhood, her world, her entire life, were unbelievably removed from mine in suburban Australia, and yet I felt like I was right inside her head every step of the way. From a little half-pint nibbling maple-sugar candy in the Big Woods of Wisconsin and weeping over a frozen rag doll on the prairie, to her newly-wed joy in the delights of Almanzo's purpose-built pantry on their new claim. (Those neat drawers filled with different kinds of sugars and flours!) I think why I loved this one the most...no, why I kept returning to it most often, is because it was the culmination (for then) of her life, from teaching her own school in the most miserable, terrifying of conditions, to her surprised realization that she had herself a beau! I felt like I'd grown up with her, although separated by over a hundred years, half a planet, and innumerable cultural differences. It's also the reason I still have a (theoretical) fondness for pearl-and-garnet rings. I suppose the next-most-velvety books in my collection are my 1973 imprint Narnia collection (held together with Scotch tape and love, like my Ingalls Wilders) and my one-volume 1968 paperback edition of 'Lord of the Rings'. You can see what kind of a world my inner child lived in! The funniest part is, I have new editions/sets of all of these favorites, but I often go back to my old, soft ones, perhaps to revisit a feeling, or a world, rather than simply to read the stories. It IS possible to travel through time, if you keep your standards quite reasonable! Speaking of time-travel, my Douglas Adams trilogy (in five parts) is pretty beaten-up, too.
Posted by: Helen | July 22, 2006 at 08:56 AM
What a fun exercise in nostalgia... I agree with Helen that These Happy Golden Years is wothy of being read til its worn to pieces, as is Little Town on the Prairie. My copies were literally falling apart by the time I had children, so I used that as an excuse to buy new hardback copies as I read through the series with my daughter when she was around six. She's read through the series hersef, but not with the same passion that I had I'm a little sad to say.(For some reason, she has a mind of her own with her own favorite peices of literature.) My copies of A Tree Grows in Brooklyn and A Lantern in Her Hand by Bess Streeter Aldrich are also almost beyond salvaging. I was attracted, obviously, to books about stereotypically "simpler" times. I think that my interest in knitting and cooking stems from those books. Francie's mother in A Tree Grows in Brooklyn was too busy trying to make sure that the family didn't starve to sit quietly in the evening and knit, but the other books had domesticity as central elements, even though Laura wasn't crazy about a lot it!
Posted by: Caroline | July 23, 2006 at 09:52 AM
What a joy it was to see a picture of Franz Werfel's SONG OF BERNDADETTE on your stack! That was a book I loved and also read several times during my high school years, along with THE DIARY OF ANNE FRANK. Somehow, however, everyone I know loved Anne Frank, but very few people I know read Bernadette.
Thanks for a lovely trip down memory lane.
Posted by: Mardel | July 24, 2006 at 05:52 AM
Oh, I don't know. I've always kind of liked Cinderella, and think the Disney version always had a certain amount of spunk. I liked that about her! (Same with Drew Barrymore's version a few years ago.) And yes, Anne Frank got me trying to write a diary, too . . . not that it lasted!
I loved the Scholastic books, too, and still have some of mine. I loved the Ruth Chew books...
Posted by: --Deb | July 24, 2006 at 03:07 PM