A Bluestocking Knits

Saturday

Not long ago, David needed to go down to San Diego to collect some tool or other that he was buying from a friend, and said, "Let's have a little road trip," and so he and I went to Temecula and visited the Temecula Quilt Company shop which has been mentioned rather frequently here of late, and which is going to online-only in the next few months.  I had thought, "Gee, what can I do with all of these mini quilts once I sew them up" as I'm not really the quilt-on-the-wall type, and eventually I thought, "Duh!  Placemats!"  And so I came away from the shop with one each of their last two mini quilt kits, a booklet of doll quilt patterns (which are often about the same size as placemats ...), and some pre-cuts of TQC fabrics.  After lunch in San Diego, we stopped off to visit some friends who recently moved to the wilds of the Santa Ana Mountains -- had a good visit and a delicious dinner, with the bonus of a gorgeous sunset -- so all in all, an excellent day.

I sewed up the first mini quilt kit in an afternoon, deciding to arrange the squares randomly instead of in four-patch. The kit is of the same high quality as the others, with a generous selection of fabrics and clear, concise instructions.  I backed this with some navy Kona Cotton and hand-quilted it, pleased to see that I'm getting a bit better at the latter, though that may also have something to do with the batting being thinner that what I used previously, and thus easier to manipulate the needle through!

I'm glad I started with this one, as it was thus clear to me early on that for placemats, I think I will want most of them slightly longer than the 16" here.  I've sewn up the pinwheel kit, and will start quilting it soon.

I do have -- of course -- another distraction --

which is Mamilou's charting of an antique sampler which I found almost accidentally while I was researching French samplers.  I decided, since I had some linen that has quite a loose weave, to experiment with three strands of floss instead of two, to get that rather "thick" look that so many antique samplers have, usually (I guess) from the original stitcher using wool and not modern cotton floss.  It's actually quite a success, I think! and because of the loose weave isn't at all too much.  I was originally thinking that I would veer towards a "re-creation" and follow Léontine's mistakes as well as the now-missing stitches, but the chart has a few "corrections" and I've made a few mistakes of my own (!), so it is Léontine as well as a soupçon of both Mamilou and me!

And I do, I assure you, still knit, although it may not seem like it!  I like this wool and think this will make a fabulous scarf, but I cannot knit it during Zoom meetings, as I lose track of which row I'm on and find after an hour that I worked a plain row when I should have worked a pattern row, or vice versa, and have to rip out all I've done since then.  This is the longest it's been yet! --

Thoughts on the Basic (Baby) Blanket

This, at last, is the "Basic Blanket" from Simple Crochet for Cherished Babies by Jane Davis, which I have to say, was an utter pain most of the time I spent on it, but is very pretty now that it's finished and draped artfully over the arm of a sofa.  I had searched for blanket or afghan patterns that called for 10 balls of Jaeger Baby Merino and would be fairly quick to make, and this seemed to fit the bill perfectly, but ten balls were not enough by at least one, and I spent quite a lot of time having to figure out not only the instructions themselves but how to arrange it so that I could get as much of the pattern worked with almost every inch of the ten balls I had.

Strangely, although my gauge came out noticeably larger than given in the book, with the same weight yarn and my usual 1-size-smaller hook, the finished measurement of the panel was smaller than given.  How can that be?

There really should be a more-clear photo of what this blanket is supposed to look like when laid flat. I suppose that this --

-- which is the photo from the book, is clear enough once you've already made the thing, but before I got to that point, I heartily wished to see it more fully.  (What does the seam look like? for example ...)

I found out early on from reviews on Amazon that a lot of people have had difficulties with a number of patterns in this book, so perhaps I'm a bit more salty than I would have been if I thought it was just me.  I suppose I can figure out that if the instructions say "weave in end after row 11" that I'm supposed to break off the yarn at that point, or that if it says "sew the panels together" that I'm supposed to make a second panel, but it doesn't say so at all.  But I was mystified by the instruction "Work row 8 along the top and bottom edges of the blanket" -- it's multi-directional, so which edges are the top and bottom?!

This edging, by the way, is simply begging for a chart, but I am not at that stage yet, myself.  (Laura herself came in not long after I'd hidden the blanket-in-progress but not my attempt at a chart.  "What's this?" she asked, "some weird code??")

After trying to puzzle out the directions, then trying to figure out from the photo what was meant in the directions, I came up with these alternate instructions for certain rows, with my choices and some clarifications in boldface. Note that in the main body of the panel, the initial ch3 does not count as a stitch -- you are making loops in which to anchor the edging.  (This, if I remember correctly, is not what the general instructions say at the beginning of the book.)  The initial ch3 in the border, however, does count as a stitch.  I also did 1 less ch than specified at the beginning of each row, as mine tend to be a bit looser than average, I guess, so that one less ch made my edges a bit straighter than they would have been --

• Row 3: Ch3, 1 DC, [ch1, sk 2, DC, ch1, sk 2, 3 DC in next st] 32 times (on the last rep, 2 DC at very end) [129 sts].
• Row 4: Ch3, DC, [(DC, ch1, DC) all in next st, 2 DC in next st, sk 3, 2 DC in next st] 32 times, (DC, ch1, DC) in top of ch3.  Note that the "sk 3" will be above a DC in the row below.
• Row 5: Ch3, 2 DC in 1st st, [DC in sp of sk3 section, 6 DC in ch1 sp] 32 times, 3 DC in top of ch3. Note that the 6-DC cluster will be above the 3-DC cluster in the row below.
• Row 6: Ch3, sk1, 1 HDC, 1 DC, sk1, [2 DC, 2 HDC, 2 DC, sk1] 32 times, 2 DC, 1 HDC in top of ch3.  Note that each bracketed section will be centered over the 6-DC cluster of the row below.
• Row 7: STDC, DC in 1st st, DC, sk1, (2 DC, sk1) 64 times, 3 DC (the last in top of ch3).

As I said, I did not have nearly enough wool to do the four rows of DC mesh at the top of each edging section (which is worked four times!), so in frustration, I just worked the mesh on each side until the wool ran out, estimated how many rows total I could get, which ended up being about a quarter of what was called for, and then ripped out the ones that had gone past that.  In the end, I decided that, really, an open section of mesh down the middle makes a rather drafty afghan, and so I would work the edging only through Row 7 on one side of each of the two panels, stitch those two together, and then work as much of the mesh as I had yarn on the two "outside" borders. 

It also seemed to me -- and perhaps I'm mistaken, not having that much experience with crochet -- that having a mattress-stitched seam running through a quite-pretty lacy panel might look just a bit clunky, and so, remembering some particularly clever methods I'd come across for joining crochet squares and used myself with tolerable success, I decided to do one of those instead of a mattress-stitched seam.  (I used the fourth one from the top, the one with the sort of "telegraph pole" look to it).  I thought this suited the pattern quite well, actually, and would recommend it to anyone making this blanket, certainly if not using the full complement of mesh rows down the middle.  (I ended up, by the way, after joining the two panels after their respective 7th rows, getting a grand total of two rows of mesh on the two outside edges, four altogether, far less than the sixteen the pattern called for with ten balls of Baby Merino, even subtracting maybe two of those which got used up in my join.  Oof.)

But -- as I said -- it turned out very pretty, and I'm also quite happy with the color, which was Jaeger Baby Merino 233 Lilac overdyed with 1 package of grape Kool-Aid per ball.  Interesting that it came out mottled even though I did not try to get it so.  It looks very different in different lights, as you can see!

(Yes, that is my HST quilt, finished and on the bed!)

"Japanese View"

The "Japanese View" cross-stitch is completed, partly-blocked, and ready for framing!

The chart is by Irina Neskorodeeva and is available free at Smart Cross Stitch.  It is actually quite polished for a free chart -- I don't mean to sound snobbish, mind, but it is complex and clearly has had a good deal of thought and effort put into it, so was a generous contribution to the free-charts library by the designer.

I did make a few tweaks -- as I said before, I like the more-solid look of full cross stitch, so the mountains and "sky" here are not in half-cross as in the original.  I have used partial stitches in the past, and so I wondered why they aren't used here, to smooth out the stair-step edges on the many curves.  I did blend the colors at the upper edge of the peak on the far left, just by going over the color-change with a single thread of the darker color, which made it flow a little better, to my eye.  There was a slightly-harsh straight line across the "sky" where the palest-pink is, which was probably more apparent in my full-cross than it would have been in half-cross, and so I just skipped a few stitches in a sort of programmed-random manner, fewer and fewer through the four or five rows as I went upwards.  

I confess I had a terrible time keeping on track in all parts of the sky, partly mistaking which small "panel" I was on, and partly just miscounting, and so the blending isn't quite what was intended, but luckily the shading is particularly effective either way.  I wasn't quite happy with my French knots, either, which seemed to have a mind of their own and never wanted to lean in the direction I thought they would go, so that the effect isn't quite what it is in the original, but there it is.

And because I clearly crave more than one needlework project going at the same time! --